Inter-rater reliability and annual rescoring of the Charlson comorbidity index.

نویسندگان

  • Judith Bernardini
  • Susan Callen
  • Linda Fried
  • Beth Piraino
چکیده

A measure of comorbidity in dialysis patients must not only predict outcomes but also be reproducible and easy to obtain. Our primary purpose in the present study was to determine the inter-rater reliability of the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Our secondary purpose was to evaluate the usefulness of annual rescoring of the CCI as a predictor of patient survival. We included in the study 100 consecutive patients (mean age: 52 +/- 16 years; 85% white; 39% with diabetes) who started PD between 1995 and 2000 at a single center: Two nurses independently scored the CCI at the start of PD. One nurse rescored each patient on the yearly anniversary of the start of PD. Patient survival was recorded for each year Kappa score and time-dependent analysis were applied. The kappa score between the two CCI scores at the start of dialysis was 0.93. (The average scores by the two nurses were 5.2 and 5.3.) Annual rescoring of the CCI demonstrated no increase in its predictive value regarding patient survival. However, given the minimal change in the CCI for the patient population in the present study, that question needs further study. Over time, the average CCI fell--an unsurprising result, because patients with higher CCI scores at the start of dialysis are the most likely to die. We conclude that the CCI is a reliable and easily applied tool for assessing comorbidity. Dialysis units should consider obtaining this measure at the start of dialysis in all patients. Repetitive annual scoring was not helpful in improving prediction of survival.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Reliability of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status scale in clinical practice

BACKGROUND Previous studies, which relied on hypothetical cases and chart reviews, have questioned the inter-rater reliability of the ASA physical status (ASA-PS) scale. We therefore conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate its inter-rater reliability and validity in clinical practice. METHODS The cohort included all adult patients (≥18 yr) who underwent elective non-cardiac surgery...

متن کامل

How to measure comorbidity. a critical review of available methods.

The object of this article was to systematically review available methods to measure comorbidity and to assess their validity and reliability. A search was made in Medline and Embase, with the keywords comorbidity and multi-morbidity, to identify articles in which a method to measure comorbidity was described. The references of these articles were also checked, and using a standardized checklis...

متن کامل

[Usefulness of comorbidity indices in operative gastric cancer cases].

OBJECTIVES The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the usefulness of the following four comorbidity indices in gastric cancer patients who underwent surgery: Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Cumulative Illness rating scale (CIRS), Index of Co-existent Disease (ICED), and Kaplan-Feinstein Scale (KFS). METHODS The study subjects were 614 adults who underwent surgery for gastric cancer...

متن کامل

How I Treat How I assess comorbidities before hematopoietic cell transplantation

Organ dysfunctions (comorbidities) were found to be associated with the outcome of treatment of a given primary disease and, in particular, cancer. In 2005, a hematopoietic cell transplantationcomorbidity index (HCT-CI) was introduced as a measure of organ dysfunctions that was suited for recipients of HCT. The HCT-CI was developed from the historical Charlson comorbidity index after introducin...

متن کامل

Nurse-Physician Agreement on Triage Category: A Reliability Analysis of Emergency Severity Index

Background and Objectives: MThe Emergency Severity Index (ESI) triage is commonly used in clinical settings to determine the patients’ emergency severity. However, the reliability of this index is not sufficiently explored. The present study examines the inter-rater reliability of ESI by comparing triage ratings as performed by nurses and physicians. Methods: This prospective cross-sectional st...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Advances in peritoneal dialysis. Conference on Peritoneal Dialysis

دوره 20  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2004